If the board is unable to identify the signature on a proxy, what is their course of action?

When the board is faced with a situation where they cannot identify the signature on a proxy, the appropriate course of action is to reject the proxy. This is based on the principle that proxies must be properly executed and verified to ensure the integrity of the voting process. Accepting a proxy without clear identification could lead to challenges regarding the legitimacy of the vote, and it violates the standards of accountability that community associations are expected to uphold. Ensuring that only valid proxies are counted helps maintain order and trust in the association's governance.

In contexts where the identity of the signee is not verifiable, allowing the proxy could result in unauthorized representation, which can compromise the integrity of decisions made during the meeting. Therefore, rejecting the proxy is the correct approach to safeguard the decision-making process and protect both the organization and its members.